Hi, Itâs been a strange couple of days (or years, really?). Once again, weâre standing at a split in the timeline, moving forward into a distinctly different future. I canât help but imagine the parallel universe where the American election results turned out differentlyâwhat would it feel like to be living in that version of the world right now?
Currently, Iâm in Paris for meetings ahead of Franceâs AI Action Summit this February. Technology is moving so fast that I donât think any of us are truly prepared. Human beings are incremental creatures, shaped by slow evolutionary processes. Our systemsâphysical, emotional, societalâhave been in place for tens of thousands of years. We werenât designed to navigate life at exponential speed, and yet thatâs exactly whatâs being demanded of us. At this moment, I want to make the case for Slow Knowledge. Just because information is coming at us faster than ever doesnât mean itâs accurate, meaningful, or even true. Weâve become obsessed with speedâinstant everything, 24/7 breaking news cyclesâbut weâre forgetting one of the basic truths about how our brains work: information might move quickly, but learning takes time. Iâve made an intentional shift away from speculative stories and âbreakingâ news that feels designed to squander my attention. Iâm no longer interested in engaging with information that isnât final. This slow, deliberate approach feels essential, especially as it applies to technological developments. I refuse to be rushed into accepting or adopting new technologies without taking the time to truly understand them. For example, at CES this year, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang introduced COSMOS, described as the âworldâs first world foundation model.â This AI model is designed to help robots and autonomous vehicles navigate the physical world faster and more effectively. Training AI-powered productsâwhether theyâre robots, cars, or vacuum cleanersâtypically requires expensive, labor-intensive datasets that must be meticulously organized and labeled. COSMOS aims to streamline this process by using advanced neural networks to generate physics-aware videos that accelerate training. On the surface, this sounds impressive. But it raises serious questions: What about security? Bias? Risk mitigation? What happens when these technologies inevitably make mistakes, as all new innovations do? What protocols are in place to address these challenges? Does anyone remember this episode from Season 2 of Love, Death and Robots? It's the one where the vacuum cleaner turns into a killing machine. Just saying. As technological change accelerates, itâs critical that we donât let the speed of innovation dictate the pace of our thinking. We need to be thoughtful, deliberate, and intentionalânot just in how we consume information, but in how we engage with the tools and systems shaping our future. Slowing down doesnât mean resisting progress. It means making space for clarity, discernment, and ultimately, better decisions. And maybe, in this moment of upheaval and uncertainty, thatâs exactly what we need most. â Despair by Design: The Case for HopeIn an earlier dispatch, I wrote about economic velocityâabout the quiet power we hold as consumers to shape the world we live in. At the time, Iâd committed to being more deliberate with my spending: supporting local businesses, exercising my financial power to align my values with my choices. That commitment feels even more urgent now. When Mark Zuckerberg announced Metaâs updated content moderation policiesâincluding a baffling decision to permit language referring to women as objects (âitâ)âI felt a familiar anger bubble up. Itâs not just about this one policy; itâs about the broader, relentless tide of violenceâpolitical, physical, emotionalâagainst women. Some of it is overt, like the horrifying Telegram group where 70,000 men exchanged ideas for assaulting the women in their lives. Some of it is quieter but no less insidious, like the rollback of DEI initiatives across industries. Together, these moments reinforce the feeling that the world is becoming increasingly hostile to women. But anger, while justified, isnât where I want to stay. Iâve been thinking a lot about despairâhow it works, what it does to us. Despair convinces us that nothing we do matters, that weâre powerless. Itâs a tool of oppression, designed to keep us stuck, overwhelmed, and inert. Hope, on the other hand, requires courage. To imagine a better futureâand believe itâs possibleâis a radical act of defiance.
Recently, I stumbled upon a small wellspring of hope: Violette and Co., a feminist, lesbian, LGBTQIA+ cafĂŠ and bookstore in the 11th arrondissement, just a short walk from my home. I went in for a coffee, and in the spirit of supporting them, I picked up some of Audre Lordeâs writing. And there, on the page, was exactly what I needed to read: "To face the realities of our lives is not a reason for despairâdespair is a tool of your enemies. Facing the realities of our lives gives us motivation for action. For you are not powerless... You know why the hard questions must be asked. It is not altruism; it is self-preservationâsurvival." That quote has stayed with me. Facing reality, Lorde reminds us, isnât an invitation to give up. Itâs an opportunity to act. But to act, we have to remember that we have power. We all do. Who we give our time, money, energy, and attention toâthatâs power. What we choose to build, support, or rejectâthatâs power, too. Fixing the worldâs problems wonât come from one sweeping solution; it will come from millions of small, deliberate choices made by millions of people. For me, this shift feels personal. Iâve been asking myself: How do I move from climate despair to climate action? How do I focus my energy on solutions instead of spiraling into hopelessness? I have to choose hope. And then amplify it. For example, At CES this year, I found Flint, a Singaporean startup developing batteries. These batteries biodegrade within six weeksâyou can compost them to feed your plants. Theyâre a stark contrast to lithium-ion batteries, hich rely on child labor in dangerous mines and contribute massively to environmental degradation. Flintâs innovation feels like a small but significant step toward the future we need. This future doesnât have to be dystopian. As my friend Baratunde and I discussed on his Life with Machines podcast, we need to popularize hopeful futuresâvisions of what could be, if we make the right choices. âSolar punk!â we shouted at each other, laughing but also deeply serious. This is the kind of world I want to see: sustainable, imaginative, abundant. â Lately, Iâve been redirecting my energy away from trying to change minds through debate (as my friend Adam Grantâs Think Again has shown that this is ineffective) and toward building spaces for people who already share this vision. A world thatâs sustainable, ethical, fair, and equal doesnât emerge from convincing the unwillingâit emerges from the collective efforts of those already aligned, already hopeful, already ready to act. We can choose a better future. We can imagine it, build it, live it. But first, we have to believe itâs possible. â A New Type of Resolution (It's Weird, I Know).Given everything weâve talked about so far, I thought Iâd share a very weird (but surprisingly effective) method Iâve been using to navigate this period of chaos. It all started during my time as a member of the UNâs High-Level Advisory Body on AI. (You can read our final report here, if youâre curious.) As part of that work, I found myself poring over countless UN resolutions. And while theyâre not exactly page-turners, I found myself oddly drawn to the format. If youâve never seen a UN resolution, theyâre fairly straightforward. Theyâre divided into two sections: the preamble, which outlines the background or motive behind the resolution, and the operative section, which states the actions or opinions to be taken. The next time I found myself spiraling into uncertaintyâoverwhelmed by vague but deeply unsettling fears about the futureâI donât know what possessed me, but I opened a blank document and started drafting a personal resolution. A policy for myself, by myself. And to my surpriseâŚit worked. I think this process works for me for a few reasons. First, as a chronic over-thinker, I have a tendency to get stuck in mental loopsârevisiting the same points over and over without gaining any new clarity. Drafting a resolution forces me to step out of that cycle and focus on structure, on laying out the facts and determining actionable next steps. Second, as someone whoâs benefited tremendously from Internal Family Systems therapy (Richard Schwartzâs No Bad Parts is a top recommendation if youâre looking for more internal peace), this format allows me to give voice to the contradictions within myself. There are always parts of me that disagree with each otherâone part anxious, another pragmatic, yet another defiant. Drafting a resolution becomes a kind of negotiation, where every part gets to be heard. Finally, these resolutions serve as an anchor. When everything feels fluid, uncertain, or overwhelming, having a clear policyâhowever temporaryâhelps me ground myself. Itâs not about solving the big, unsolvable problems; itâs about deciding how I want to proceed in this moment, with the information I have. For example, last July during the French elections, there was a very real fear that the far-right Rassemblement National party might win and launch an aggressive anti-immigrant campaign. I found myself oscillating between paralysis and a panicked urge to leave France altogether. So, I drafted this resolution: â RESOLUTION ON UPCOMING FRENCH ELECTIONS: Preamble:â
Operative Section:
â Specific Action Items:
Since then, Iâve written dozens of resolutionsâon everything from climate change to personal relationships to professional uncertainty. Theyâve become a way for me to take control of my thoughts and feelings in a world that often feels uncontrollable. If this resonates with you, hit reply and let me knowâIâd be happy to share more examples or tips for drafting your own personal resolutions. After all, we could all use a little structure in these chaotic times. As always, thank you for being here and for sharing this little space with me. |
Join Digital Anthropologist and Author Rahaf Harfoush for a weekly dispatch that covers culture, technology, leadership and creativity. Come for the analysis, and stay for the memes.
Hey, For weeks, weâve been watching geopolitical tensions and shifting ideologies unravel decades-old alliances. If there was still any doubt about the direction of this new reality, the Zelensky-Trump/Vance press conference erased it. I wonât let this newsletter be hijacked by American geopolitics, but I will say this: what we witnessed wasnât just policyâit was political theater, engineered for maximum digital impact. Moments like these arenât just about diplomacy anymore; they are designed...
Hi Friend, Iâm writing this on a train back to Paris after a weekend at the Farm, but my mind is still tangled up with a fish. Specifically, a rare black anglerfish. Black Beauty When I first saw her, I recoiled. (My apologies, sweet little fish.) She was all sharp teeth and eerie translucence, a creature that looked like it had been conjured from nightmare rather than nature. But the more I learned about her, the more she started to feel like a tiny, tragic oracle. Anglerfish live in the...
Hey, People love to say data is the new oil. But oil is just a resourceâextracted, refined, burned. Data is different. Itâs our DNA, our values, our knowledge. It doesnât just power industries; it shapes reality. And watching that reality be erased in real time is terrifying. The Trump administration is systematically deleting public health records, LGBTQ health data, and climate researchâgutting the CDCâs databases under the guise of bureaucracy. Meanwhile, Elon Musk illegally accessed...